Tuesday, February 21, 2012

The age of stupid!

Hi

It was interesting wasn't it to look to the world from this perspective?


Well, it is just one side of the coin of course and a string opinion which is critical on increasing consumerism and unawareness and selfishness of people on upcoming disasters. I like to show this video in my classes because I think it makes an impression and gives us a lot to discuss later on.

While I'm in New York I want you to keep thinking about the terms we briefly discussed: sustainability, resilience and mitigation. I hope you enjoy the Jakarta lecture of Wim Stolte! Don;t hesitate to ask him questions about his experiences, he took part in amazing projects everywhere in the world to help cities prepared for disasters.

See you on 1st of March!

Best
Dr. Tuna Tasan-Kok



Thursday, February 16, 2012

Ps. Start to understand resilience

Monday we'll discuss a new term, resilience. Please have a look at Carpenter et al (2009) article that I uploaded in workspaces!

Demographic change and environmental challenges

Hi

We're moving towards a new field in human geography: Environmental challenges and societal reflections. Today I focused on the demographic change, using some interesting visual material and statistics. To make it more interesting for you and also for me!

Next week we'll start with world resources and problems facing them. When I attend my annual conference (Association of American Geographers) in New York, you will be guided by an excellent guest lecturer, Mr. Wim Stolte, who has spend all his life living in disaster zones, helping cities to be re-built or getting ready for a disaster. He will share his experiences in Jakarta with you. Meanwhile, weekend is approaching and we will still see each other on Monday.

Looking forward!

Dr. Tuna Tasan-Kok



Tuesday, February 14, 2012

Cities


Last Monday we discussed a fundamental point in the class: What is a city? Penguin Dictionary of Geography defines it simply as: In general, a large town. What an abstract definition! So we decided to move deeper into the subject to see what can be said more. I presented some classic ideas about the definition of the city dated back to 1930s.

Recognizing ‘urbanism as a way of life Wirth said that city is ‘a relatively large, dense and permanent settlement of socially heterogeneous individuals’. He was not the only one putting the urban society on the scene in the 1930s. Around the same time, and with a somewhat more sophisticated approach, Lewis Mumford defined 'the city is a geographic plexus, an economic organisation, an institutional process, a theater of social action, and an aesthetic symbol of collective unity’. We then watched an old documentary: The City (directed by Ralph Steiner and Willard Van Dyke, commentary written by Lewis Mumford).

you can download the whole film at: http://www.archive.org/details/CityTheP1939

To spice up the discussion I asked students to form groups to answer a simple question on the basis of their own experiences: What makes a city? Each group (had 4 in total) emphasized different characteristics and sometimes conflicted with each other. Some had a description, some had a list of 'must to have' features. It was fun to see how ideas differ on the basis of the different backgrounds. See them below. We ended up discussion whether Middelburg is a city or not. I guess, we couldn't conclude on that :)

Group 1:

A city is a settlement that is relatively large compared to it's surroundings. It has a central function on economic, political, social, financial, cultural and educational activities in it's region. A city is easy to reach and it has good connections with other cities eg. harbor, railway station, airport. Cities attract people with different ethnic/cultural backgrounds and it offers various job opportunities. Furthermore there is a center for higher education, for example an university or HBO.


Group 2:

A city...is a place where higher authorities (government, police) take care of it. A center of population with cultural differences, that provides facilities for each and every one of them. There are different economic activities with a commercial center. A city is a place where education is easily accessible (especially higher education). There is a clear division of social classes, therefore there are different neighborhoods. City is a place where big corporations are settled. Also transport throughout the city is easy due to all kinds of possibilities: tram, bus, train, etc.

Group 3:

A city has its own government and administrative system. It also serves as the economic/cultural center of a region and attracts capital and people. It contains an educational system and transportation structure consists of a single defined area.

Group 4:

A city needs to have at least 100.000 people with its own local government. It needs to have public and general transportation, including train station and provide opportunities for different ethnic groups and religion. Furthermore, it must have a commercial center, a hospital, night life and a university. A good balance between young and old people is important for a good economy and globalization and tourism. It must have an individualistic feeling.

Cool ha!

See you on Thursday. Remember that 2 groups will be presenting interesting cases. Can't wait!

Dr. Tuna Tasan-Kok

Thursday, February 9, 2012

Understanding Henry Ford

Hope you ejoyed the Modern Times as much as I did (why do you think it is called the Modern Times?). Each time I watch this movie I find something new. Of course, there is more than just some funny scenes of a black-white movie! It covers main elements of the 20th century urban society. You can see the ongoing class struggle, and the emerging American dream or how role of women in the society is very nicely criticised. I have to laugh hard about that woman coming out of her house to say goodbye to her husband, who is obviously going to his work in the morning. They live somewhere in the suburbs as its a house with a garden (with a drive way). She is jumping with an amazing joy to say goodbye to her husband and go back into her home-based life. Poverty and unemployment are the main problems that Chaplin tries to point out and strikes as a reaction of the urban working class...We notice Taylor's time management there in the factory and what assembly line and Fordist efficiency is all about (quite exaggregated of course). Mass production and mass consumption patterns are visible as well. Of course, this movie is not made for academic purposes (but sure Chaplin would have been happy to know that young people watch (or forced to watch :)) his movie even in the 21st century). Watching this film with geographers lenses is different than just watching for fun. And that was the whole exercise about. Hope you could capture some interesting elements for your essay assignment. Remember: I don't need you to copy information from the internet but just try to comprehend the Fordist period's characteristics by reading your chapter and some other extra material that you may find elsewhere and then to connect that knowledge to what you've seen in the movie. I appreciate you reading more stuff so please go explore google.scholar to find some interesting reading materials on this topic.

Comprehending the dynamics of urban development in the 20th century in just one lecture is not possible and you'll hear more on Fordism in the future. So it makes a lot of sense to read the chapter 'The making of the 20th century world' just one more time to comprehend the challenges and opportunities the century offered for cities (and also to get some hints.

And yes, next week our screen will be full of colorful ideas on cities. Cities lecture will be on Monday and two student-led seminars will take place on Thursday. The presenting teams for Thursday had very interesting ideas so I can't wait to see what they will show us on Thursday!

See you on Monday...



Dr. Tuna Tasan-Kok

Wednesday, February 8, 2012

Understanding the urban dynamics of the 20th century: The Modern Times


Hi

Tomorrow (9 February) after a brief introduction on the changing dynamics of 20th century industrial capitalism we're going to watch Charlie Chaplin's Modern Times together. It is important that you read Chapter 3: The Making of the 20th Century World because you will have an assignment. While watching the movie I will want you to observe certain dynamics that your reading material nicely provides. We'll mainly focus on the Fordist production methods and what Fordism has changed for the urban society and the city itself. The Modern Times provides a very nice summary of these dynamics. And it's fun!
So please come to the class being prepared and, if you like, you can bring drinks and finger food because we're not going to have a break!

See you tomorrow

Dr. Tuna Tasan-Kok

Monday, February 6, 2012

Rise and spread of capitalism


I know today's lecture confused you a little about the content of this course. Don't worry, this is all part of the plan...Today, after discussing Middelburg's medieval characteristics we concentrated on certain economic theories and processes from feudalism and merchant capitalism towards industrial capitalism. I referred to the ideas of some heavy weights like Adam Smith and Karl Marx. And you've made a small group exercise to go through the Chapter 2 of the textbook and we mentioned some other theories (like World Systems Theory) or theoreticians like Wallerstein. I tried to show you how Smith's model on capital, production and profit and Kondratief's waves made sense to explain different economic periods in the history of cities. There is a reason for this economic focus of course. Remember the 'vegetable' methaphor I mentioned in the firts course! We need to understand the layers of relations that lead to urban processes.

Like Kostof (1991) I also believe that understanding urban form can be possible by understanding the processes behind it. Like many other urban explorers I believe that understanding main economic dynamics that lead to the accumulation of capital in certain places and cities, and created certain societal processes and cultural contexts, we are able to comprehend the spatial transformations taking place in cities. You cannot separate the space from its socio-economic contents. If you comprehend the main socio-economic dynamics of first, second, and third urban revolution, post-fordism and neoliberalism, I think, by the end of this term you will be able to comprehend the change around you. You will see how different elements (neighbourhoods, parts, buildings, etc) of cities decline and then rise again with new functions and social contexts. This is the story of the capital accumulating in cities. And my approach in this course is to make you think of this as much as possible.

Thursday we will focus on the 20th century indistrial capitalism and a man who have changed the world with a single innovation: Henry Ford

See you on Thursday!

Dr. Tuna Tasan-Kok

Thursday, February 2, 2012

Reading the city: Middelburg tour February 2012 in freezing weather

I really am proud that everybody survived the walk till the last minute of our tour in this freezing weather.

Thanks for your patience and for keeping up the speed. We visited certain spots in the city to observe and search clues of diverse dynamics in five different themes:

Theme 1: Spatial organization of cities
- Patterns and spatial form
- Land-uses
- Spatial history

Theme 2: Socio-spatial structure of cities
- Segregated neighbourhoods
- Socio-economic differentiation

Theme 3: Urban economy
- Changing location of economic functions
- Globalization

Theme 4: Diversity and multiculturality
- Residential segregation
- Ethnic entrepreneurship

Theme 5: Urban ecology
- Urban green

On Monday we'll talk about the indistrial capitalism and it's influence on the geography of cities.

Have a good weekend
Dr. Tuna Tasan-Kok

Wednesday, February 1, 2012

Walking tour tomorrow

It is freezing out there so make sure you all have warm cloths and comfortable walking shoes. We're going to walk about 1 hour in this weather! Looking forward though! Dr. Tuna Tasan-Kok